Tuna and salmon are the most recommended kinds of fish. They are an excellent source of protein, vitamins and minerals. Both one and the other should appear in our diet. Will one be better than another? Should our taste preferences be the most important?
Tuna vs. Salmon – which is a better source of protein?
Among sea products, tuna and salmon are one of the cheapest and the most valuable options. So we should not be surprised that they are present on our plates quite often. Both kinds of fish are a source rich in protein. However, is one of them better?
Tuna vs. Salmon
Salmon will have about 16 calories more than tuna in each portion. This is not a big difference, and it should not pose any threat to maintain the diet for a person who exercises. By choosing salmon, we provide valuable omega-3 fatty acids, the amount of calcium similar to that contained in a glass of milk and a dose of vitamin D as high as no other food – including tuna.
Composition (values for one can)
Calories 181 197
Protein 33g 28g
Saturated fat >1g >2g
Fat 4g 18g
Besides selenium,B12, B6 calcium, Omega-3D
Tuna vs. Salmon- Summary
Due to the varied properties, it is good to eat both salmon and tuna. The first one has more valuable fatty acids, while the second one is cheaper and will provide us with more protein. The choice should be therefore made according to the nutritional recommendations and individual needs. When shopping, pay attention to the fish farming, the place of fishing and the composition on the packaging. Avoid fish from contaminated ares, exaggeratedly cheap and those whose color is so beautiful that it is unnatural.